HYBRID WAR IN THE CONTEXT OF FOREIGN POLICY, NATIONAL SECURITY CONCEPTS, AND MILITARY DOCTRINES OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Abstract

The foreign policy of the Russian Federation and the state of hybrid war are comprehensively analyzed in the article with the main political direction of national security. The author gives his own perspective on the foreign policy of the Russian Federation and the practical form of pre-state warfare in the state of hybrid warfare.

In the article, the foreign policy of the Russian Federation and the state of hybrid war are analyzed in a comprehensive manner with the main political direction of national security. The author emphasizes that the analysis of the concept of hybrid warfare in the context of foreign policy, national security concepts and military doctrines of the Russian Federation in the foreign article of the Russian Federation helps to understand why Russia has made hybrid warfare a tool of its foreign policy more than other countries. 1. He gained the necessary experience and was convinced of its effectiveness (for example, during the war in Chechnya); 2. Used the necessary resources (opportunities, experts, technology); 3. Realized the low cost of hybrid operations; 4. Hybrid warfare creates difficulties in identifying the aggressor. All of this is fully explained by Taliaferro's resource extraction model, which shows which strategies are at risk of being implemented in order to increase competitive advantage and the likelihood of survival.

Therefore, the relevance of the article is an important search within this topic. The article describes different definitions of the problems of a hybrid society and how they address the international laws of war, suggesting that Russia, faced with external threats, has chosen one of three balancing strategies: immutability, emulation, and innovation, which requires the creation of entirely new institutions, technologies, or governance practices.